Tags: Reflective Essay English MajorFree Descriptive EssayForensic Psychology Dissertation TopicsSolving Proportion ProblemsAbstract Of Research ProposalGothic Texts EssayBusiness Plan For Clothing CompanyRush Essay SignEssay My Recess PeriodBrief Business Plan
It should arouse suspicion that Sotomayor had socialist — and predictably anti-business — leanings at Princeton, a situation the White House decided to face head-on by releasing a photo of the nominee from her 1976 Princeton yearbook.The photo sits beside this quote from socialist Norman Thomas: “I am not a champion of lost causes, but of causes not yet won.” In a thesis for Princeton, Sotomayor identified Luis Mun, the governor of Puerto Rico and a one-time socialist, as a hero.It recently ran a story under the headline, “Sotomayor’s Appellate Opinions Are Unpredictable, Lawyers and Scholars Say.” The bottom line is that Sonia Sotomayor has a lengthy history of being hostile to one of the foundations of a prosperous economy and thriving business sector: a stable and predictable rule of law.
What Sotomayor believed in the 1970s is interesting. Unfortunately, her judicial philosophy and track record on the bench suggest that she is frighteningly hostile to business.
In a 1996 article for the , Judge Sotomayor argued that legal theorist Jerome Frank was correct that the “law must be more or less impermanent, experimental, and not nicely calculable.” That’s very bad news for business, since predictability is the mother of business confidence, and every important decision a company makes is much more difficult without a reasonably predictable legal system.
Both women expressed gratitude for colleagues who supported them throughout their careers.
“There were always men of good will, who understood that equality had to be put into practice,” Sotomayor said. That gift is my enduring gift from Princeton.— Claire Thornton (@claire_thornto) October 5, 2018 When asked why they decided to attend the University, neither Sotomayor nor Kagan could remember the exact reason.
The Second Circuit reversed this decision, too, and the Supreme Court agreed, with only Justices Stevens and Breyer standing by Sotomayor’s position.
seems to agree that there is a randomness to Judge Sotomayor’s rulings in business cases.“No matter how hostile of an environment it may seem, you have to look around for those people who will stand with you.” Sotomayor: Princeton was so transformative for me. Being in the third and eighth classes to admit women, respectively, both justices recalled feeling keenly aware of their gender throughout their studies at the University.But each praised the opportunities Princeton granted them, and expressed how thrilled they were to see the thousands of alumnae gathered together before them.In light of today’s breakneck political intrusion into the economy through bailouts and government-coerced bankruptcy cramdowns, the predictable enforcement of the laws by the courts is more essential than ever., she ignored the clear language of the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998, the purpose of which is to establish a set of uniform national standards for security litigation in order to avoid the unpredictable application of varying state laws. Sotomayor’s philosophy of unpredictability is even more starkly on display in a pair of class-action cases.Ramona Romero, the University’s general counsel, introduced the justices by highlighting their similarities: Both women hail from New York, love baseball, and wrote exceptionally long senior theses for the Department of History.Heather Gerken ’91, the first female dean of Yale Law School, moderated the talk.The justices’ discussion of partisanship was particularly timely, given U. Court of Appeals judge Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court and the intense partisanship that has surrounded his approval process.Both the justices and the moderator remained silent on Kavanaugh and the allegations of sexual misconduct against him.Supreme Court Justices Sonia Sotomayor ’76 and Elena Kagan ’81 spoke to thousands of mostly female audience members on Friday about the court’s impartiality, challenges faced by women in their careers, and memories from their time at Princeton as part of the 2018 “She Roars” conference.At the talk, which was moved from Robertson Hall to Jadwin Gymnasium to accommodate demand, the justices were greeted by a warm and excited standing ovation.