Prove yourself once and you’ll get asked to review again!Having fellow experts within your field evaluate your work before publication is not just a formality; it's an essential part of the academic world.Think about this as your “take-home” message for the editors.Tags: Music Therapy EssayWhat Is Methodology In Research ProposalDental Receptionist Resume Cover LetterThesis On Investment PolicyThesis Statement On DementiaIllegal Immigration Pros And Cons EssaySociology Essays
This shows the editor how you interpreted the manuscript and will highlight any major differences in perspective between you and the other reviewers.
Give an overview of the manuscript’s strengths and weaknesses.
This will also help you keep your comments organized.
Think about structuring your review like an inverted pyramid.
Put the most important information at the top, followed by details and examples in the center, and any additional points at the very bottom.
Here’s how your outline might look: In your own words, summarize what the manuscript claims to report.
It’s helpful to divide this section into two parts: one for major issues and one for minor issues.
Within each section, you can talk about the biggest issues first or go systematically figure-by-figure or claim-by-claim.
What’s the difference between a major and minor issue?
Major issues should consist of the essential points the authors need to address before the manuscript can proceed.