Could it be that we ride astride Change with one foot in powerful Totality and the other in terra crazy? But it does a good job of showing many of the prejudices that have guided our thinking about the future, that have stood in our line of vision demanding that we Think Things Out when something other than detailed intellectualization is required. Toffler is right about many of the changes that are taking place, and maybe about a lot of the traumas too.But the whole thing is immensely larger than the psychodrama that Toffler depicts.Our physicality forces us to be aware of the most “concrete” among these emergent patterns.
Could it be that we ride astride Change with one foot in powerful Totality and the other in terra crazy? But it does a good job of showing many of the prejudices that have guided our thinking about the future, that have stood in our line of vision demanding that we Think Things Out when something other than detailed intellectualization is required. Toffler is right about many of the changes that are taking place, and maybe about a lot of the traumas too.But the whole thing is immensely larger than the psychodrama that Toffler depicts.Our physicality forces us to be aware of the most “concrete” among these emergent patterns.Tags: Research Paper Writing FormatApa Style Citation Paper Presented At ConferenceA Good Thesis Statement On SlaverySample Business Plan For Poultry FarmingProgressive Reform Movement EssayExpository Essay Extended DefinitionSpeech And EssayHomework GameWriting A Good Cover Letter
Logicians know this; one of the most basic logical fallicies is prejudice.
Logic alone is not sufficient for prophecy or even for the kind of broad, detail-littered scenario that Toffler was trying to create.
Maybe it was larger than the culture and it was the other way around. Perhaps the sad and cynical attitude toward life I find so often in their quarter could be called a product of future shock.
Reflecting on this last week, my imaginings turned darker. Everybody had either thrown theirs away or stashed it somewhere forever. Clearly Nixon also suffered something like it, when the American people suddenly became intolerant of abuses that were quite acceptable to him. Most of us still cope pretty well, and this is why, for the most part. He thought we couldn’t cope, at least not without his generous help. Above the title, the cover reads “THE SYMPTOMS OF FUTURE SHOCK ARE WITH US NOW.
If we were built to feel mass with the same sensitivity as we see light; or if we could feel the magnetism of the earth, like migrating birds; or if we could sense many of the other emergent patterns of reality that escape sensory detection — perhaps we would know at a conscious level much of what our subconcious has always known — that there is much more to everything than meets the senses, and almost all of it is beyond words.
In the last paragraph of , Toffler says, “These pages will have served their purpose if in some measure they helped create the consciousness needed for man to undertake the control of change, the guidance of his evolution.” Is a “consciousness” needed to control change, to guide evolution?Toffler hoped that we would generate assumptions upon which the power of systematic thought could be brought to bear, for the purpose of “deducting” new skills.This shows a profound misunderstanding of what skills are all about. Each skill is through active and repeated dwelling in a process.In atomic physics a chain reaction in accelerated unstable atomic activity threatens to explode when it reaches something called critical mass. It there an unstable, uncontrolled chain reaction going on? How, I ask myself, can I get on when life abounds with massive offenses to my sensibilities?I think the reason we cope goes beyond the often boring nature of daily life, or the need to ignore depressing things, or apathy or moral deficiency — though all those things can help.It is not even enough for him to understand the present, for the here-and-now environment will soon vanish. It is only by generating such assumptions, defining, debating, systematizing and continually updating them, that we can deduct the nature of the cognitive and affective skills that people of tomorrow will need to survive this accelerative thrust. It holds that man creates himself consciously, through reason, defining, systematizing, updating and especially deducting (as if this were how we reason).Johnny must learn to anticipate the directions and rate of change. In truth, when it comes to what we do, where we go, how we live and especially how we cope, little is . Our lives, our Selves, involve far more than higher cerebral activity. He was wrong, in part, because he was wrong about people.He must, to put it technically, learn to make repeated, probabilistic, increasingly long-range assumptions about the future. To create a super-industrial education, therefore, we shall first need to generate successive, alternative images of the future; assumptions about the kind of family forms and human relationships that will prevail. The future is not something totally distinct from the present, always waiting to mug us around the next corner.The cultural changes that threaten us are of our own making, and the future we suffer or enjoy will grow, writhing with change, out of the present.In fact, skills are impossible to perform if one pays them too much attention.It is difficult to read, for example, if you focus purely on the way you look at the words, or on the speed at which your eyes can scan the page, or on the words themselves, or even on the letters that make up the words.