He brings attention to some ethical and debated issues from different points of view like physician-assisted suicide and Christopher Reeve's wanting to walk. Riley's writing flips between the general analysis and his personal experience in a way that leaves the reader feeling there are two books going on inside the one, and they are not well-integrated.
The reader is left with the impression that Riley really wanted to write about his perspective on the downfall of .
For example: -- Page 2 — "The image makers who present these spectacles should know better, but their industries are so insular (and becoming more so, with corporate consolidation) that they are blind to the compelling reasons for improving the situation and deaf to the faint criticism offered so far, which could have alerted them to the insults and problems they create." (Bold added). Berkeley, CA: University of California at Berkeley Bancroft Library.
In this one sentence Riley has managed to use the words blind and deaf to imply ignorance and indifference. Disability Rights Movement and Independent Living Movement Web Site.
Riley writes about the representation of disability in popular TV, film, advertising, and magazines, as well as how disability issues are covered in disability publications.
He makes reference to the many pioneers in the disability movement who forged a new path in the effort to make disability more accurately represented across all types of media.This word suggests that the image or the attitude is unconsidered, naive, the by-product of ignorance or unfamiliarity.Stereotypes are also by definition unchanging; when a stereotype has been exposed as inadequate or false to experience, it can be transcended and left behind.Copyright © 2002, National Center on Disability & Journalism." As executive director of National Center on Disability & Journalism (NCDJ), I know that Appendix A is not NCDJ's copyrighted material.After contacting Riley about this, his quick email response said "but I was pretty sure that was the credit was right not only with you but with tari who also signed off on it (as she had written most of it)." Checking with Tari, she did not have any memory of doing so.Lebanon, NH: University Press of New England, 2005, 244 pages, Hardcover 1584654732.Reviewed by Suzanne Levine, National Center on Disability & Journalism Seldom is a book devoted solely to media and disability issues — and even less common is a book that claims to critically analyze how disability is represented in mainstream media. Riley II's book was met by this reviewer with excitement and hope. It is plagued with inconsistent writing style, inaccuracies, and ironically, frequent use of disability euphemisms, which makes the book a missed opportunity.The consequence of these inaccuracies leads this reviewer to wonder what else is wrong and to question if the information can be trusted in areas where the reviewer has little or no knowledge.It is not a book that could be given to students knowing that they would be accurately informed. Profitability, Diversity, and Disability in Advertising in the UK and United States.Explaining the history of the independent living movement, disability historian Steve Brown writes about the actual name of these groups of students: "They even gave themselves a name, 'The Rolling Quads.'" (1999).-- On page 51, there is mention of a "helpful check list from Easter Seals (reproduced in full as Appendix A)." Appendix A states, "These guidelines are used by permission.